The combination of source material from a writer like Joe Hill and a director like Scott Derrickson was always going to pique the interest of horror fans. After leaving production on Dr. Strange and the Multiverse of Madness for the oft-cited “creative differences”, Derrickson elected to work on something less flashy and more intimate. The result is the adaptation of Hill’s short story The Black Phone from his 2005 20th Century Ghosts collection of short stories.
Hill’s story, though atmospheric and effective, is somewhat slight for a feature-length adaptation, and Derrickson teams up with his regular screenwriting collaborator C. Robert Cargill to flesh it out, taking inspiration from Derrickson’s own childhood, even altering the setting to a Denver neighbourhood much like the one he grew up in. He increases the number of victims taken by Ethan Hawke’s character The Grabber, and gives them their own backstories as well, making them full characters in their own right, instead of simply spooky voices at the other end of the titular phone.
From the outset, Derrickson’s film combines a sense of childhood nostalgia with a powerful undercurrent of violence and fear. Cheerful childhood pursuits such as baseball, bottle rockets, and bicycle rides are interrupted by The Grabber’s first grab, transitioning into an unnerving opening credits sequence, underpinned by Mark Korven’s deeply unsettling score. After this point, it becomes clear that childhood in this neighbourhood is far from idyllic, and The Grabber is a long way from being the only threat. Indeed, he is paralleled in a number of more “ordinary” characters, and there are risks much closer to home. Violence is a fact of daily life, and as Finney will learn, you need to stand up for yourself.
As a quick note, there are scenes of domestic abuse, which are deeply uncomfortable, but carefully portrayed. These kids are not sanitised and idealised Hollywood children; they swear, fight, bleed and cry, giving a greater sense of realism to a film that is focused almost entirely upon them. Also helping in this regard are the truly excellent performances from all the young actors, most especially Mason Thames and Madeleine McGraw as the two young leads. Thames has mentioned in interviews that his first audition was via Zoom because of COVID-19 regulations, and it’s easy to see how even under those circumstances, he won the role – his performance as the thoughtful and gentle Finney is tender and utterly believable. As his feistier younger sister Gwen, McGraw, too, is superb, easily standing up to the older actors with whom she shares scenes.
Ethan Hawke, as The Grabber, has the additional difficulty of acting through a series of full and half masks (eerie creations by the legendary Tom Savini) for the majority of his time on screen, but even so, manages to effectively express a series of complex emotions, giving us hints at what lies beneath. Wisely, however, Derrickson and Cargill choose never to attempt to explain or in any way rationalise his actions; The Grabber is a monster, a childhood nightmare, not a psychological case study. Where the behaviour of other violent characters is given some illumination, The Grabber remains a classic boogeyman and is the more frightening for it.
The Black Phone of the title is almost a character itself. Through some hallucinatory SFX, it seems more alive than the victims whose voices emerge from it, and it isn’t always clear if it’s there to help or hinder.
The film is masterfully shot and lit, making especially effective use of negative space in the many scenes in the basement cell, where Finney is trapped, to emphasise the apparent loneliness of his situation and, later, to suggest places where unseen helpers might be standing. Outside of the cell, the use of colour, in particular through the use of authentic 70s fashions, but also from a gentle sepia tone, effectively brings to mind films made in the era in which this is set.
Although there are certainly some spooky moments featuring the ghosts of the Grabber’s previous victims and the titular phone, they are, perhaps unexpectedly, not the main sources of tension and horror in this film. That comes from the more mundane: Finney’s attempts to escape the basement and evade The Grabber’s wrath, Gwen’s lonely and risky search for her brother (albeit aided – somewhat – by clairvoyant dreams), and the simple but real horror of child abduction and the effect it has on a neighbourhood. The supernatural elements are weirdly inessential, and the story could certainly stand alone without them with very few changes, but they do add a nice bit of extra flavour.
The film ties together a thread that runs throughout the film in what I found to be a satisfying way, but at the same time, makes use of a few rug-pull surprises to keep you from getting too comfortable- some from the original story, some new. It manages to evoke films like E.T. and The Goonies, or perhaps the closer to home IT and Stand By Me, based on stories by Hill’s father, Stephen King; at its heart, this is a film about kids ganging together against a threat that the adult authorities are proving useless, or even actively harmful, against. It’s just that some of the kids happen to be dead.
There’s a palpable sense of helplessness running throughout the film as one of the most admirable aspects, which really adds to the tension. It’s helped hugely by such strong performances from a large young cast, especially the two young leads, as well as writing that doesn’t sanitise the childhood experience. It’s nostalgic without descending into pastiche. Derrickson’s use of elements from his own childhood to flesh out characters and situations, whilst remaining authentic to Hill’s short story, give it a real sense of authenticity.
It’s hard to think of something significantly negative – I really enjoyed the film – but I would perhaps have liked a bit more of a balance between the supernatural elements and the mundane. The fact that the film could almost stand alone without the supernatural aspects speaks to its realism, but I’d have liked a bit more spookiness!
Overall, a creepy but tender offering from two horror legends and a talented cast and crew, this phone is one that’s definitely worth answering.
More Film Reviews
If you’re familiar with the name Ryuhei Kitamura, you are most likely familiar with either the beloved zombie action flick Versus (2000), the exquisite jidaigeki (period drama) Azumi (2003), the… There have been many horror films that tackle the theme of trauma in recent years, but this one really pushes things a bit further. Traumatika is a 2024 horror film… Here’s another trashy offering from Hong Kong! You know, as a fan of Asian cinema, there are days when my cinema fix can only be satiated by truly thought-provoking high… Rave (Svartklubb) is a 2020 Swedish body horror film written and directed by Nils Alatalo in his first feature-length debut after graduating from film school. The film stars Isabelle Grill… Would you answer the door for a stranger and let them into your home? The year 2024 has been abound with diverse horror releases, ranging from a slasher largely observed… Dreams of Flesh is a 2024 sci-fi horror, written and directed by Davide Pesca with additional writing from Fabrizio Pastura. The film is the third and final installment in the…The Price We Pay (2022) Film Review – We All Want To Make A Living Don’t We?
Traumatika (2024) Film Review – Trauma is a Disease [Frightfest]
The Skin Striperess Film Review [1992] (Dir. Billy Chan)
Rave (2020) Film Review – We’re Off to the Discotech
Oddity (2024) Film Review – Don’t Let This One Slip Your Radar
Dreams of Flesh (2024) Film Review – VR Therapy